<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cuckmere Estuary Partnership &#187; membership of CEP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/tag/membership-of-cep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Coastguards cottages</title>
		<link>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/coastguards-cottages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/coastguards-cottages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastguards cottages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership of CEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: Why can Coastguards Cottagers not join the CEP?
A: Current membership of the Partnership consists of local organisations who have direct responsibilities for the estuary, for example as land owners and/or land managers. However, the Partnership is happy to consider applications from others who have a substantive interest in the estuary. The Partnership has met [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q: Why can Coastguards Cottagers not join the CEP?</strong></p>
<p>A: Current membership of the Partnership consists of local organisations who have direct responsibilities for the estuary, for example as land owners and/or land managers. However, the Partnership is happy to consider applications from others who have a substantive interest in the estuary. The Partnership has met with representatives of some of the Coastguard Cottage owners to discuss the possibility of them joining. Given the Partner’s preferred option of working with nature rather than against it, the owners in question chose not to join at that time. However, they have continued to attend individual meetings, and we see no reason why this cannot continue. Discussions are continuing with some of the owners and we are hopeful that they will soon be represented on the Partnership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/coastguards-cottages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parish councils</title>
		<link>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/parish-councils/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/parish-councils/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership of CEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: Why can’t Parish Councils contribute to the Partnership?
A: Current membership of the Partnership consists of local organisations who have direct responsibilities for the estuary, for example as land owners and/or land managers. However, the Partnership is happy to consider applications from others who have a substantive interest in the estuary.
The Partnership has met with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q: Why can’t Parish Councils contribute to the Partnership?</strong></p>
<p>A: Current membership of the Partnership consists of local organisations who have direct responsibilities for the estuary, for example as land owners and/or land managers. However, the Partnership is happy to consider applications from others who have a substantive interest in the estuary.</p>
<p>The Partnership has met with the Chairman of Cuckmere Valley Parish Council to discuss the possibility of them joining. Given the Partner’s preferred option of working with nature rather than against it, the Parish Council chose not to join. However, they have continued to attend individual meetings, and we see no reason why this cannot continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/parish-councils/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Costs of joining</title>
		<link>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/costs-of-joining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/costs-of-joining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership of CEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: Could I have the details of what membership of Partnership would cost/benefit to consider joining the group?
A: There are currently no specific costs associated with joining the Partnership, although costs do arise, for example those associated with the current engagement events. Future costs may include studies into key issues, e.g. understanding the historic environment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Q: Could I have the details of what membership of Partnership would cost/benefit to consider joining the group?</strong></p>
<p>A: There are currently no specific costs associated with joining the Partnership, although costs do arise, for example those associated with the current engagement events. Future costs may include studies into key issues, e.g. understanding the historic environment and potential impacts on the local economy. For practical reasons, membership of the Partnership is currently limited to those with a direct responsibility for the estuary, e.g. landowners/land managers. This does not exclude other organisations or individuals working with the Partnership and we welcome this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuckmere.org.uk/2009/08/12/costs-of-joining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

